* scm_num2double vs scm_to_double
@ 2006-03-27 22:54 Kevin Ryde
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Kevin Ryde @ 2006-03-27 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
Is there a reason scm_num2double isn't the same as scm_to_double?
scm_num2double has a check for a bignum which is so big it comes out
as an infinity, but scm_to_double allows the inf return.
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2006-03-27 22:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-27 22:54 scm_num2double vs scm_to_double Kevin Ryde
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).