From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Sting abstraction 2 Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 23:11:36 +0200 Message-ID: <878wkreayf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1242833049.32575.7271.camel@localhost.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1242854850 895 80.91.229.12 (20 May 2009 21:27:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 21:27:30 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 20 23:27:23 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M6tJn-00024k-84 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 May 2009 23:27:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58183 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M6tJm-0004fi-M9 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 May 2009 17:27:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M6t4y-0007ju-5t for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2009 17:12:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M6t4s-0007iz-T1 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2009 17:11:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54746 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M6t4s-0007iw-JW for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2009 17:11:54 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:60314 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M6t4s-00057E-5K for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2009 17:11:54 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1M6t4o-000284-J1 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2009 21:11:50 +0000 Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 20 May 2009 21:11:50 +0000 Original-Received: from ludo by reverse-83.fdn.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 20 May 2009 21:11:50 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: reverse-83.fdn.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 1 Prairial an 217 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: i686-pc-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:KAwayy56CdDIkh46wNbKGuMhsDY= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:8496 Archived-At: Hello! Mike Gran writes: > Anyway, I backtracked a bit. Today I pushed a new tree > (string_abstraction2) which should be the same as master except with all > unnecessary calls to scm_i_string_chars, scm_i_symbol_chars, and > scm_i_string_writable_chars removed. I largely avoided other > unnecessary modifications. It is still an 8-bit string build, but, now > the string internals have been confined to strings.c and strports.c, > with very few exceptions. How does it differ from the approach you took a while back (e.g., http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel/8436)? (The commit notification message is hard to follow because it contains many commits in addition to the relevant ones.) Thanks, Ludo'.