Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> writes:

> Instead of using 'null?' and 'cdr' on the syntax object, can you please
> rework this to use 'syntax-case'?  I.e. instead of (if (null? ...) ...)
> do this:
>
>   (syntax-case #'(rest ...) ()
>     (() <null-case>)
>     ((name rest ...) <non-null-case>))
>
> What do you think?

Yes, that would be much better. It's startling how often I forget I can
syntax-case this way.

Changed, okay for me to push?

-- 
Ian Price -- shift-reset.com

"Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"