From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Do you recognize these modules? Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 11:36:05 +0100 Message-ID: <878v5etnca.fsf@zigzag.favinet> References: <87zk9r8p1s.fsf@gnuvola.org> <8762bz89zg.fsf@gnuvola.org> <87r4unszj2.fsf@gnu.org> <87k40eg0k1.fsf@gnuvola.org> <87mx59kxqw.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364034843 27360 80.91.229.3 (23 Mar 2013 10:34:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 10:34:03 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 23 11:34:28 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UJLmJ-0006wa-OS for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 11:34:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57613 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJLlw-0005lp-6e for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 06:34:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37424) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJLlt-0005lX-0C for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 06:33:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJLlr-0001pH-5H for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 06:33:56 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp206.alice.it ([82.57.200.102]:52126) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJLlq-0001ot-Qq for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 06:33:55 -0400 Original-Received: from zigzag.favinet (82.58.3.55) by smtp206.alice.it (8.6.060.15) id 511D120D05862A47 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 11:33:53 +0100 Original-Received: from ttn by zigzag.favinet with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UJLo8-0000rz-0P for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 11:36:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87mx59kxqw.fsf@pobox.com> (Andy Wingo's message of "Tue, 15 May 2012 22:14:31 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 82.57.200.102 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:15975 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable () Andy Wingo () Tue, 15 May 2012 22:14:31 +0200 2.0 is the current stable branch, so any changes should go there first. If it's a build fix or some other fix related to forward-compatibility with 2.0, it can go on 1.8 as well. We should avoid adding interfaces to 1.8, though. When in doubt, it's best (and much appreciated) to mail the list. If no one responds in a few days, go ahead and push it of course. Does that sound sensible to you? Yes, thanks for the guidelines. I hope to pop enough stacks to get back to Guile (proper) hacking this year. Fingers crossed... =2D-=20 Thien-Thi Nguyen GPG key: 4C807502 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlFNhZkACgkQZwMiJEyAdQIVYACeMkeFLc6zHqfjZtG+jZL+YNfP 804AniSOWO5BemXTyy2hVhWkp8fEIUrC =Agpo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--