Damien Mattei <damien.mattei@gmail.com> writes:

> On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 9:07 PM Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab@web.de> wrote:
>  Damien Mattei <damien.mattei@gmail.com> writes:
>  > by keeping the same
>  > number of parenthesis, but they are just differents : ( ), { }, [ ]
>  > and it allow the use of infix expressions.
>
>  Is your implementation of {} compatible with SRFI-105? (curly infix)
>
> yes it is based on SRFI-105 

That’s very cool!

While I’m doubtful about your other changes in scheme+, this is an
improvement that I’d love to see merged into Guile.

> the operator precedence are predefined in a list ordered by priority in the source code:
>
> (define infix-operators-lst

How does it treat procedures which are not in that list?

Best wishes,
Arne
-- 
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
draketo.de