From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: scm_gc_calloc? Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2002 13:38:46 -0500 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <877kj6zcy1.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <15693.18997.339956.870162@blauw.xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028486314 8309 127.0.0.1 (4 Aug 2002 18:38:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 18:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17bQGu-00029t-00 for ; Sun, 04 Aug 2002 20:38:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17bQHS-0002Om-00; Sun, 04 Aug 2002 14:39:06 -0400 Original-Received: from dsl-209-87-109-2.constant.com ([209.87.109.2] helo=defaultvalue.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17bQH8-0002NB-00 for ; Sun, 04 Aug 2002 14:38:47 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781EDEF0B; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 13:38:46 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 766662048; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 13:38:46 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: hanwen@cs.uu.nl In-Reply-To: <15693.18997.339956.870162@blauw.xs4all.nl> (Han-Wen's message of "Sun, 4 Aug 2002 17:37:25 +0200") Original-Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:969 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:969 Han-Wen writes: > Why don't we have a scm_gc_calloc, that is, a function delivering > cleared memory? That would make a lot of C init functions shorter, > and it makes for more robust code. Sounds reasonable to me. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel