From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Threads and asyncs Date: 04 Sep 2002 20:51:44 -0700 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <877ki1hz5b.fsf@becket.becket.net> References: <87it1oglmq.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <02090420452627.19624@locke.free-expression.org> <200209050238.TAA19359@morrowfield.regexps.com> <02090421570929.19624@locke.free-expression.org> <200209050400.VAA19760@morrowfield.regexps.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031197736 27561 127.0.0.1 (5 Sep 2002 03:48:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 03:48:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, owinebar@free-expression.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17mndW-0007AF-00 for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2002 05:48:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17mnf6-0007lU-00; Wed, 04 Sep 2002 23:50:32 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17mneX-0007ih-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2002 23:49:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17mneV-0007iS-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2002 23:49:56 -0400 Original-Received: from vp190174.reshsg.uci.edu ([128.195.190.174] helo=becket.becket.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17mneV-0007iO-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2002 23:49:55 -0400 Original-Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17mngH-0006DZ-00; Wed, 04 Sep 2002 20:51:45 -0700 Original-To: Tom Lord X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Windows: Complex nonsolutions to simple nonproblems. In-Reply-To: <200209050400.VAA19760@morrowfield.regexps.com> Original-Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1300 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1300 Tom Lord writes: > > In C, you don't have grabbable continuations > > or closures. Though, sure, closures don't capture entire activation > records. In GNU C, you can create closures, albeit, ones only with dynamic extent. (This was a necessary feature to support Pascal, so it seemed appropriate to add the necessary extension to support it in C as well.) _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel