From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: srfi-1 delete proc arg order Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 18:49:39 -0500 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <877k8vrai4.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <87issjqwo8.fsf@zip.com.au> <87y91b22er.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1052784119 29590 80.91.224.249 (13 May 2003 00:01:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 00:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: marius.vollmer@uni-dortmund.de Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 13 02:01:58 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19FNEz-0007h6-00 for ; Tue, 13 May 2003 02:01:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19FNAb-0006Pv-01 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 May 2003 19:57:25 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19FN8r-00058y-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2003 19:55:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19FN8g-00053r-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2003 19:55:29 -0400 Original-Received: from dsl093-098-016.wdc1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.98.16] helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19FN36-00020z-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2003 19:49:40 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE6514482; Mon, 12 May 2003 18:49:39 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 64E98215002; Mon, 12 May 2003 18:49:39 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87y91b22er.fsf@zip.com.au> (Kevin Ryde's message of "Tue, 13 May 2003 09:03:40 +1000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1001 (Gnus v5.10.1) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2345 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2345 Kevin Ryde writes: > I applied this change to the head, someone else can make an > executive decision about the 1.6 branch. Marius, any opinion? Technically it's a bug fix as measured against the documentation, but if people have already accomodated this bug in their code, and just not said anything, the change would mean breakage for them... -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel