From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Support for (system '("echo" "foo" "bar")) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 12:13:11 -0600 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <877k2nykso.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <87ad7l9i8h.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87y8v4ywap.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87he1s81g6.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1067452208 15350 80.91.224.253 (29 Oct 2003 18:30:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, Greg Troxel Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 29 19:30:05 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AEv53-00026c-00 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 19:30:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AEv4g-00058s-Gi for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 13:29:42 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AEupN-0004vS-VS for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 13:13:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AEuom-0004Vd-HB for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 13:13:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [66.93.216.237] (helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AEuoj-0004Sq-1J for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 13:13:13 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001423F4A; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 12:13:11 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 88563810B5; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 12:13:11 -0600 (CST) Original-To: Marius Vollmer In-Reply-To: <87he1s81g6.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> (Marius Vollmer's message of "Wed, 29 Oct 2003 17:15:37 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2932 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2932 Marius Vollmer writes: >> Nope, system* would be perfectly fine with me too. > > That's what I prefer as well. So would we want (system* . args) or (system* arg-list)? What are guile's argument count limitations? (Suppose the underlying OS's could be relevant as well...) -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel