From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: module GC bug Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 21:57:45 +0300 Message-ID: <877jfqh93q.fsf@zagadka.de> References: <42A8D188.20007@xs4all.nl> <87fyuq1mrr.fsf@zagadka.de> <42CEF39F.2040608@xs4all.nl> <87irzeh122.fsf@zagadka.de> <42D59370.7080802@xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1121541765 9424 80.91.229.2 (16 Jul 2005 19:22:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 19:22:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 16 21:22:43 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DtsF9-0006oD-7M for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 21:22:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DtsGz-00066Z-Nw for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:24:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DtsGt-000663-SK for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:24:23 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DtsGs-00065r-6M for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:24:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DtsFX-0005ff-SG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:22:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [213.243.153.36] (helo=smtp3.pp.htv.fi) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dtrzh-0005os-BO for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:06:37 -0400 Original-Received: from zagadka.ping.de (cs181072157.pp.htv.fi [82.181.72.157]) by smtp3.pp.htv.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id AF72627AC3E for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 21:57:45 +0300 (EEST) Original-Received: (qmail 13590 invoked by uid 1000); 16 Jul 2005 18:57:45 -0000 Original-To: Han-Wen Nienhuys In-Reply-To: <42D59370.7080802@xs4all.nl> (Han-Wen Nienhuys's message of "Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:19:28 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5164 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5164 Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > what happens if the weak (c[ad]r ITEM) is marked through a postponed > weak vector that you haven't processed yet? Then P is removed > erroneously, or am I missing something? Hmm, you are right. I first have thought about this behavior as a feature, but I now see that it is in fact not wanted. The order the weak vectors are processed in affects the result, which is not good, obviously. Right now, I hope to get around this by repeatedly scanning all weak vectors until no new markings have taken place, and only then remove the unmarked items. Thanks for pointing this out! -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel