From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Block comments and `read-hash-extend' Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 01:59:17 +0300 Message-ID: <877jdw783e.fsf@zagadka.de> References: <87k6kumykq.fsf@laas.fr> <87ll59on6s.fsf@zip.com.au> <87fyvh4exx.fsf@laas.fr> <87ekb0mwty.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1125875976 20100 80.91.229.2 (4 Sep 2005 23:19:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 23:19:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 05 01:19:34 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EC3kl-0006xh-BU for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 01:18:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EC3pA-0002Rt-Nk for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 19:22:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EC3nZ-0001tu-Sd for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 19:21:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EC3nU-0001rx-QD for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 19:21:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EC3nT-0001bZ-Kw for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 19:21:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [213.243.153.37] (helo=smtp1.pp.htv.fi) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EC3Vv-0007Fj-1C for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 19:03:03 -0400 Original-Received: from zagadka.ping.de (cs181072157.pp.htv.fi [82.181.72.157]) by smtp1.pp.htv.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id 23D127FC0D for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 01:59:18 +0300 (EEST) Original-Received: (qmail 6868 invoked by uid 1000); 4 Sep 2005 22:59:17 -0000 Original-To: Rob Browning In-Reply-To: <87ekb0mwty.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> (Rob Browning's message of "Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:40:09 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5210 Archived-At: Rob Browning writes: > ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > >> Still, I don't understand the rationale behind this and I consider thi= s >> a limitation. In fact, it's misleading compared to block comments in >> other languages or in SRFI-30. > > Unless there's a strong counterargument, I'd like to see #| |# work > in-line, in accordance with SRFI-30 and Common Lisp, and perhaps #! !# > should just be a synonym. Right now, HEAD already copes with in-line #! !# comments. We could copy it over to 1.6... Do you think this would be OK? And yes, we should probably support #| |# as the primary block comment syntax and make #! !# an option so that #! can be used as a read-hash extension. Patches welcome! :-) --=20 GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel