From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: `scm_list ()' Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:58:22 +0000 Message-ID: <877j8d4mgh.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87ek2mumle.fsf@laas.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138913888 15176 80.91.229.2 (2 Feb 2006 20:58:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:58:08 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 02 21:58:02 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F4lVz-0004iw-5u for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:57:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F4lNE-000380-90 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:48:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F4jl2-0000do-7k for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:04:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F4jky-0000bK-BX for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:04:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F4jkx-0000b5-MX for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:04:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.84.72.33] (helo=mail3.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F4jjq-00078i-3d for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:03:26 -0500 Original-Received: from laruns (unknown [81.136.79.105]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895F2409FCD for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from laruns (laruns [127.0.0.1]) by laruns (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B1406F701 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:58:24 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87ek2mumle.fsf@laas.fr> ( =?iso-8859-1?q?Ludovic_Court=E8s's_message_of?= "Thu, 02 Feb 2006 10:38:37 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5646 Archived-At: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > The funny thing is that to get a list, you had to have a list already > (OBJS is a list here). I don't really get the point of this function in > fact. ;-) Presumably that's why it has been removed! > Should the following be enough to ensure compatibility? > > SCM > scm_list (SCM obj) > { > scm_c_issue_deprecation_warning ("`scm_list' is deprecated. Use " > "`scm_list_n' instead."); Shouldn't that be something like "`scm_list' is deprecated. Wherever you have `scm_list (X)', you can replace it by just `X'." Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel