From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: srfi-9 record type checking Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 09:31:48 +1000 Message-ID: <877j3sr197.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <873behlvnw.fsf@zip.com.au> <87k67sudbj.fsf@laas.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1149723138 18716 80.91.229.2 (7 Jun 2006 23:32:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 23:32:18 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 08 01:32:15 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fo7VQ-0000iX-1I for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 01:32:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fo7VP-00069s-BM for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2006 19:32:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fo7VM-00068w-5g for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2006 19:32:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fo7VK-00066f-AO for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2006 19:32:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fo7VK-00066c-2w for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2006 19:32:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [61.8.0.84] (helo=mailout1.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fo7d1-0007ba-3b for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2006 19:39:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (mailproxy1.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.86]) by mailout1.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id E86C2328385 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 09:31:59 +1000 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (ppp2AB9.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.42.185]) by mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id k57NVwcQ007020 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 09:31:59 +1000 Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Fo7V7-0002OW-00; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 09:31:49 +1000 Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: <87k67sudbj.fsf@laas.fr> (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s's?= message of "Wed, 07 Jun 2006 18:42:56 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5969 Archived-At: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > > I don't think we can add an optional argument to `record-accessor' while > preserving the current behavior by default. That optional argument > would have to be more than just a default value: typically it would have > to be a wrong-type-arg handling procedure, I had in mind a flag, or maybe a keyword, (record-accessor my-type 'strict) just to ask for the different flavour procedure coming back. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel