From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: r6rs libraries Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 00:39:58 +0100 Message-ID: <877i32qkz5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <2bc5f8210812271705h3f57cb29w5bb83cb02abe971@mail.gmail.com> <2bc5f8210901111521i1a5ec85em65ee20135cc55ebb@mail.gmail.com> <877i4z89jy.fsf@gnu.org> <2bc5f8210901251627t5d59f9fg5bc5dcceaf2a0b9f@mail.gmail.com> <2bc5f8210901280926o399f4505nc1d30c6017886a81@mail.gmail.com> <2bc5f8210902161035p1f2e9125p58c2ad6c4def28fb@mail.gmail.com> <2bc5f8210903032123q28fbc802jed51b68445b162d6@mail.gmail.com> <87vdqp1y21.fsf@gnu.org> <2bc5f8210903041451o70f4671cscd7d37bab33d0f31@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1236382833 29814 80.91.229.12 (6 Mar 2009 23:40:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 23:40:33 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 07 00:41:50 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lfjfh-0000FT-4F for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 00:41:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53462 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LfjeL-0003fu-NB for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:40:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LfjeH-0003f9-Me for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:40:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LfjeG-0003ex-7W for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:40:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48650 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LfjeG-0003eu-4w for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:40:12 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:43430 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LfjeF-0006OW-M4 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:40:12 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LfjeC-00057Y-A5 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 23:40:08 +0000 Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 23:40:08 +0000 Original-Received: from ludo by reverse-83.fdn.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 23:40:08 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: reverse-83.fdn.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 17 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Vent=F4se?= an 217 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: i686-pc-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:+omNoDPbLGPYmZGzOq7588cBQU0= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:8241 Archived-At: Hello! Julian Graham writes: >> But dot files are traditionally "hidden" on Unices.  Why not go with >> `foo/bar/6/baz.scm'? > > Because my initial plan was to make it possible to have R6RS libraries > coexist with Guile modules, using the same directory layout and load > system -- and, as per our earlier discussion, numbers can't be part of > module names. Hmm, yes, but how about `foo/bar/baz-6.scm'? Is there a reason to reject it? Thanks, Ludo'..