From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: =?utf-8?b?zrs=?= the ultimate showcase Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:27:21 +0100 Message-ID: <877hw638iu.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87r5uest8f.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1252610981 11484 80.91.229.12 (10 Sep 2009 19:29:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:29:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 10 21:29:34 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MlpKk-0000jL-H4 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:29:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59883 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MlpKg-00087Y-4O for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:29:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MlpKZ-00086h-DZ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:29:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MlpKU-00085n-JG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:29:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47276 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MlpKU-00085J-Bd for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:29:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]:50193) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlpKP-00047s-UX; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:29:10 -0400 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-147-112-99.range86-147.btcentralplus.com [86.147.112.99]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A801F6A65; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:28:28 +0100 (BST) Original-Received: from arudy.ossau.uklinux.net (arudy [127.0.0.1]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2023938023; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:27:22 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <87r5uest8f.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22's?= message of "Thu\, 10 Sep 2009 17\:40\:48 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9303 Archived-At: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Hey, > > Now that we have Unicode, let=E2=80=99s not put it to good use! > > (define-syntax =CE=BB > (syntax-rules () > ((_ formals body ...) > (lambda formals body ...)))) Can it be overridden? Just in case someone writes an algorithm where they'd really like to have =CE=BB as a variable? (In other words, I guess, can define-syntax things in general be overridden?) > Should =E2=80=98boot-9.scm=E2=80=99 provide this macro? If the answer to the above is Yes, definitely. Neil