From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Test coverage of libguile Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:58:18 +0000 Message-ID: <877huf9qxh.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87skd3bdw8.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1256763528 1731 80.91.229.12 (28 Oct 2009 20:58:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 28 21:58:37 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N3FbJ-00022n-9K for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:58:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55326 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N3FbI-0003TT-E1 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:58:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N3FbE-0003T6-8O for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:58:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N3Fb9-0003RN-HU for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:58:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49508 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N3Fb9-0003RK-8w for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:58:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]:49744) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N3Fb5-000514-FO; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:58:23 -0400 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-147-112-196.range86-147.btcentralplus.com [86.147.112.196]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5F31F692B; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:58:20 +0000 (GMT) Original-Received: from arudy (arudy [127.0.0.1]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5154038024; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:58:19 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: <87skd3bdw8.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22's?= message of "Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:56:55 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9595 Archived-At: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > Hello Guilers! > > I set up Nix/Hydra to build code coverage reports for 1.9: > > http://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/guile2test/guile_1_9_coverage/all > > The meat is here: > > http://hydra.nixos.org/build/106916/download/1/coverage/libguile/index-= sort-l.html > > In short, we have a number of red boxes that it would be nice to > decrease. :-) Fantastic stuff. I had a very quick look at some of the unhit code, and in many cases it would only take a few minutes to write a test to cover it. I will do some of that myself, but patches are welcome from everyone! (Less than 10 lines doesn't need copyright assignment...) > We really need a similar tool for Scheme code now. Indeed that would be good. Any idea how? Neil