From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: FOL Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:09:23 +0200 Message-ID: <877hiljszg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <201009162100.34493.stefan.tampe@spray.se> <87mxrhjucd.fsf@gnu.org> <201009162302.30541.stefan.tampe@spray.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284671386 19870 80.91.229.12 (16 Sep 2010 21:09:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:09:46 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 16 23:09:45 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwLiC-0004le-Lr for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:09:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38847 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OwLiB-0008IP-Q0 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:09:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60759 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OwLi4-0008FL-8K for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:09:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwLi2-00083B-MT for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:09:35 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:46275) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwLi2-00082q-H0 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:09:34 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwLi0-0004dM-Tj for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:09:32 +0200 Original-Received: from yoda.fdn.fr ([80.67.169.18]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:09:32 +0200 Original-Received: from ludo by yoda.fdn.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:09:32 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 23 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: yoda.fdn.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 30 Fructidor an 218 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volutio?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?n?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:73koY9EW8zdlrgpx7/hY//t6yIY= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10927 Archived-At: Hi, Stefan Israelsson Tampe writes: >> > For setting up the error reporting I used a pdf >> > describing the syntax-parse macro >> > >> > http://www.ccs.neu.edu/scheme/pubs/icfp10-cf.pdf >> >> Yeah, that seems like an improvement in terms of error detection and >> error reporting (better than “source expression failed to match any >> pattern”...). >> >> However, I don’t like the aesthetics: keywords, and, worse, type >> annotations embedded in identifiers. > > The syntax can be fixed, any ideas? No, but I think that having a consensual syntax among Schemers may be more sustainable than rolling our own macro system. :-) Thanks, Ludo’.