From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: compiler dep on r6rs Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:36:20 +0100 Message-ID: <877hdqf8az.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pqricw7u.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296199902 10577 80.91.229.12 (28 Jan 2011 07:31:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 07:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 28 08:31:38 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Piiny-0005qo-29 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:31:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54927 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiiVn-0005GT-7a for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:12:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46606 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiiVA-00047E-MA for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:12:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PiiNf-0007HX-Ad for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:04:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.82]:14576) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PiiNf-0007GR-47 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:04:27 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,387,1291590000"; d="scan'208";a="97141047" Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr (HELO nixey) ([80.67.176.83]) by mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 27 Jan 2011 20:36:21 +0100 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 8 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pluvi=F4se?= an 219 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: (Andy Wingo's message of "Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:07:32 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 192.134.164.82 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11366 Archived-At: Hi! Andy Wingo writes: > On Thu 27 Jan 2011 14:28, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >> A potential problem is that (rnrs io ports) uses bytevectors, defined in >> (rnrs bytevectors), so we would perhaps need an (ice-9 bytevectors) as >> well[*], and a new node in the manual for each, etc. > > Currently (rnrs bytevectors) doesn't import (rnrs base), and I can't see > that changing any time soon, so perhaps we can leave (rnrs bytevectors) > where it is. > >> Is the only problem of the current solution that compilation of Guile >> itself is slower? (Which is a real problem, but I=E2=80=99m trying to g= et the >> big picture.) > > Yes, and opens more files, and takes more memory. Well, OK. Ludo=E2=80=99.