From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Scheme Implementers Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:54:03 +0100 Message-ID: <877hdm6ac4.fsf@ambire.localdomain> References: <87bp2za0tr.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296377998 18450 80.91.229.12 (30 Jan 2011 08:59:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 08:59:58 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 30 09:59:50 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PjT8P-0000CF-MQ for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:59:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34848 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PjT8O-0003Mk-Vj for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 03:59:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43653 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PjT8L-0003Ly-8e for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 03:59:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PjT8K-0006Qe-Bi for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 03:59:45 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp209.alice.it ([82.57.200.105]:37255) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PjT8K-0006QG-6X for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 03:59:44 -0500 Original-Received: from ambire.localdomain (79.0.68.227) by smtp209.alice.it (8.5.124.08) id 4C1A2759109B11C2 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:59:43 +0100 Original-Received: from ttn by ambire.localdomain with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PjT2p-0000qZ-31 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:54:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Noah Lavine's message of "Sat, 29 Jan 2011 16:23:39 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 82.57.200.105 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11419 Archived-At: () Noah Lavine () Sat, 29 Jan 2011 16:23:39 -0500 a lot less coordination among Schemes right now than there should be Scheme is a fun platform for experimentation, which is sometimes at odds w/ coordination. Personally, i wouldn't sweat it overmuch.