From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Fmt Module Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 16:01:13 +0200 Message-ID: <877hbkwtli.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y64ig0rq.fsf@gmx.at> <87oc5dtyfy.fsf@gnu.org> <87ei5xjqha.fsf@gmx.at> <87zkok43w5.fsf@gnu.org> <87aagirnar.fsf@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301234489 8610 80.91.229.12 (27 Mar 2011 14:01:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 14:01:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Rottmann Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 27 16:01:23 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3qWx-0002CA-Fq for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 16:01:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54473 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q3qWw-0001nE-SK for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:01:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41050 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q3qWs-0001mr-VO for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:01:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3qWp-0001vB-Lv for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:01:18 -0400 Original-Received: from solo.fdn.fr ([80.67.169.19]:37739) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3qWp-0001uz-HP for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:01:15 -0400 Original-Received: from nixey (reverse-83.fdn.fr [80.67.176.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: lcourtes) by smtp.fdn.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF56145549; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 16:01:14 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 7 Germinal an 219 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <87aagirnar.fsf@gmx.at> (Andreas Rottmann's message of "Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:03:56 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110013 (No Gnus v0.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 80.67.169.19 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12011 Archived-At: Hello, Andreas Rottmann writes: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: [...] >> Besides it=E2=80=99s still unclear (to me) what the future of Wak and si= milar >> projects is. I hope that it will take off, but I haven=E2=80=99t forgot= ten >> Snow, ScmPkg, etc. either. >> > Well, there's a (IMHO) important difference in that Wak packages are > based on R6RS, which specifies a module system. But it doesn=E2=80=99t specify how modules are mapped to files. And there=E2=80=99s R7RS, which specifies and slightly incompatible module system, and there=E2=80=99s people who=E2=80=99ll always want to use their implementation=E2=80=99s native module system, etc. Let=E2=80=99s hope I=E2=80=99m overly pessimistic. :-) Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.