unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
To: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: when and unless
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 17:42:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877h29k5xs.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 877h29oeeq.fsf@pobox.com

Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> writes:

> On Tue 06 Dec 2011 12:17, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> I've actually wondered if it would not make sense to return
>> *unspecified* in the case of the plain else-less if even if the
>> condition is true, namely when you write (if #t #t).
>
> I have wondered this too.
>
>> There is probably code relying on this to be #t, but frankly, this
>> appears like a recipe for breakage.
>
> Yeah.  A first (and probably worthwhile) step would be to warn if such
> a statement is processed for value.

Well, is it being processed for value if what I do with the value is
calling unspecified? on it in order to find out whether I should warn
about a function returning a value when it shouldn't?

I am working on a language where returning values in certain contexts
might at one point of time might lead to the values being used.  So I
need to implement warnings to that effect in order to find out calls
_not_ returning *unspecified*...

-- 
David Kastrup




  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-06 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-30 10:44 when and unless Andy Wingo
2011-06-30 21:46 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-07-01  7:50   ` Andy Wingo
2011-07-01 12:47     ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-12-05 20:23 ` Andy Wingo
2011-12-06  7:48   ` Marijn
2011-12-06  8:29     ` Alex Shinn
2011-12-06 11:17       ` David Kastrup
2011-12-06 16:25         ` Andy Wingo
2011-12-06 16:42           ` David Kastrup [this message]
2011-12-06 17:35             ` Andy Wingo
2011-12-06 22:08               ` David Kastrup
2011-12-06 23:05                 ` Chris K. Jester-Young
2011-12-07  9:23                   ` David Kastrup
2011-12-07 15:58                     ` Chris K. Jester-Young
2011-12-08  8:42                       ` David Kastrup
2011-12-08 15:34                         ` Chris K. Jester-Young
2011-12-08 16:10                           ` David Kastrup
2011-12-08 18:10                         ` Ian Price
2011-12-07 16:10         ` Chris K. Jester-Young
2011-12-06 19:05     ` Chris K. Jester-Young
2011-12-06 19:33       ` Andy Wingo
2011-12-06 14:39   ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-12-07 14:19     ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-12-07 14:27       ` David Kastrup
2012-01-07  0:16       ` Andy Wingo
2012-01-07 22:36         ` Ludovic Courtès
2012-01-20 20:19           ` Andy Wingo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877h29k5xs.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org \
    --to=dak@gnu.org \
    --cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).