From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ricardo Wurmus Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] add SRFI-119 / language/wisp to Guile? (new patch, squashed) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 22:37:02 +0100 Message-ID: <877ck5t370.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87h6w2fkz8.fsf@web.de> <87fsb5i912.fsf@web.de> <87ttzc7gwa.fsf@gnu.org> <1e0d07bc-dcf8-fe56-7f16-a72e5df0c20d@telenet.be> <875ybr2hk9.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8jrdmk5.fsf@web.de> <87jzzr7cba.fsf@web.de> <87v8hc8i8v.fsf@web.de> <87legrs23a.fsf@gnu.org> <209e68fd-b010-8213-6c9b-a0d1b8f0f72c@telenet.be> <87o7jf2slw.fsf@web.de> <875y5h8j04.fsf@web.de> <87il9ctzhl.fsf@gnu.org> <875y5cdyvt.fsf@web.de> <87sf7omuag.fsf@web.de> <877co1jgww.fsf@web.de> <875y3egjtd.fsf@web.de> <87sf5v67k5.fsf@web.de> <87mstf9e67.fsf@web.de> <340c71c5-9e25-d622-8b24-9c18ea373a77@mutix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32661"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.10.8; emacs 29.1 Cc: "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" , Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Christina O'Donnell Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 19 22:37:57 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rQwYm-0008IE-Sj for guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 22:37:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQwYQ-0007BJ-Ni; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 16:37:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQwYP-0007BB-Ty for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 16:37:33 -0500 Original-Received: from sender4-of-o50.zoho.com ([136.143.188.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQwYO-0003C2-9s; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 16:37:33 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1705700249; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=XxIj5NLbsAkZfj7yj5qy14VPrYOjQPNfz1cSiNlqqdHLP2hgUC4TQFP2CSzLHacaYEaYHYOmEJ9ZAYosPHljVJnafX6Pg582dMxZOnJYD4PY1ryU2uZqw773dni5ISYLtxw+j3HFVCMMYk2CYPjFAWHfJctEPOdpMFD6C0fTaqA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1705700249; h=Content-Type:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=HGVFCZpzISSiv/oFcHViBbfyiMZFiDb216QBcKhteVw=; b=GNSZ1A3GAjmOOEYmIAD0hPRiTvWtG9bzVHpn82VWZhRaOz7Vv7FCs0wDndHWVEb9mzFEvhR52YODRB1KvFVf6lg7JZBN3ODU3eoU/lVpcnt9/pDO+X6uVC/lEWAIgpqSma7IRe3mPWvltnx6a6LET14+61EdxBmsbF33BRiiABw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1705700249; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:From:To:To:Cc:Cc:Subject:Subject:Date:Date:In-reply-to:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=HGVFCZpzISSiv/oFcHViBbfyiMZFiDb216QBcKhteVw=; b=ZpgDAg8T0fBRhZXJHdpszIdXRfEL93TKyY6UeVyvOw2kT1rlBWgoUoXEMCaP+h+v B+uvq7rsjVeKWvDlojYzXOps7Z7wUYIycCixvAu71xkQ8B+7ehu9nGoEx22aFMT7SHb japV5LzXHeHOFUH3+B3zk/5T7j9LEKboH6AtXXc8= Original-Received: from localhost (251-108-142-46.pool.kielnet.net [46.142.108.251]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1705700247226747.1420957797121; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 13:37:27 -0800 (PST) In-reply-to: <340c71c5-9e25-d622-8b24-9c18ea373a77@mutix.org> X-ZohoMailClient: External Received-SPF: pass client-ip=136.143.188.50; envelope-from=rekado@elephly.net; helo=sender4-of-o50.zoho.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.devel:22271 Archived-At: Christina O'Donnell writes: > Likewise, commenting code in scheme is a pain because code-commenting > is done by > line. R6RS comments (#;) aren't implemented in Guile to my knowledge. So > parenthesis aware commenting is left up to the editor to implement. #; works in Guile. -- Ricardo