From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: dynamic argv0 relocation Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:38:27 +0200 Organization: Jan at Appel Message-ID: <8764wfsn18.fsf@peder.flower> References: <87zmty4b0v.fsf@peder.flower> <87ll5hx4py.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118847764 4346 80.91.229.2 (15 Jun 2005 15:02:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Han-Wen Nienhuys Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 15 17:02:42 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DiZO6-0000iO-V6 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 17:01:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DiZTL-000635-6X for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:06:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DiZQ0-00048w-Eb for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:03:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DiZPy-00047x-M1 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:03:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DiZKV-0002Lo-Ha for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:57:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.109.24.33] (helo=smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DiZ3r-0007Lx-Lr for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:40:11 -0400 Original-Received: from peder.flower (appel.xs4all.nl [80.126.34.178]) by smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5FEcWCw018967; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:38:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from janneke@gnu.org) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=peder.flower) by peder.flower with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DiZ2C-0003FR-68; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:38:28 +0200 Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87ll5hx4py.fsf@zip.com.au> (Kevin Ryde's message of "Sat, 11 Jun 2005 07:49:13 +1000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5114 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5114 Kevin Ryde writes: > No offence, but it sounds very dubious to me That's why I added the configure option and compile switch. You do not want this enabled for well behaved systems. Could you live with that? > These things are meant to be settled at the "make all" build stage. I know, but when installing on Microsoft Windows, or in a user account using autopackage on Linux, the install prefix is determined at install time. > (The gnu standards have bits about that.) (I really like the gnu standards, but when these where written, was build time not virtually the same as install time?) Btw, what bit are you referring to? > Incidentally, for a normal svr4 system won't you still need > libguile.so in a location known to the loader? It won't be able to > find it for the main guile executable otherwise. Yes, if something like this goes in, we should add that. I only used this for LilyPond's native Windows port, where wrappers are not really an option. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel