From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed `scm_i_take_stringbufn ()' Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:48:22 +1100 Message-ID: <8764nhjvl5.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <877j7zb4dl.fsf@laas.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139972973 18553 80.91.229.2 (15 Feb 2006 03:09:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 03:09:33 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 15 04:09:32 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F9D2k-0000cV-Bz for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 04:09:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F9D2M-0002yI-Hd for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:09:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F9B9B-0007hz-T2 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:07:58 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F9B99-0007g1-NE for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:07:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F9AqZ-0000Wh-Nm for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:48:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [61.8.0.84] (helo=mailout1.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F9AvL-00016N-Td for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:53:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (mailproxy2.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.87]) by mailout1.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1F0mbR1023811 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:48:37 +1100 Original-Received: from localhost (ppp22AB.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.34.171]) by mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1F0maFn012987 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:48:36 +1100 Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1F9AqE-0002nM-00; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:48:22 +1100 Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: <877j7zb4dl.fsf@laas.fr> (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s's?= message of "Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:38:46 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5712 Archived-At: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > > The problem can be reproduced using the program found at the end of this > post. It could hardly be turned into a test case, however. I made some memory leak checks for myself by demanding that "(assoc-ref (gc-stats) 'bytes-malloced)" was steady across some repetitions of a test. That's actually a different number though (is it?), but it should in theory be possible to exercise some of the malloc/free counting or balancing (post 1.8 that is :-). _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel