From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Branch management Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:57:18 +0200 Organization: LAAS-CNRS Message-ID: <8764lzt09d.fsf@laas.fr> References: <87irqltfyq.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87k6aiqfyd.fsf@minimini.mvo.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1143536270 12863 80.91.229.2 (28 Mar 2006 08:57:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:57:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Development , Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 28 10:57:46 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FOA1B-0001mr-CD for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:57:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FOA1A-0004WX-Vh for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 03:57:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FOA17-0004WS-T6 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 03:57:33 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FOA16-0004WG-60 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 03:57:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FOA16-0004WD-04 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 03:57:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.93.0.15] (helo=laas.laas.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FOA2m-0005wK-IO for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 03:59:16 -0500 Original-Received: by laas.laas.fr (8.13.6/8.13.4) with SMTP id k2S8vShY006900; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:57:29 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Marius Vollmer X-URL: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 8 Germinal an 214 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEB1F5364 X-PGP-Key: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu Mail-Followup-To: Marius Vollmer , Neil Jerram , Guile Development In-Reply-To: <87k6aiqfyd.fsf@minimini.mvo.home> (Marius Vollmer's message of "26 Mar 2006 01:09:46 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: 0 () X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang at CNRS-LAAS X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5816 Archived-At: Hi, Marius Vollmer writes: > It wasn't really planned that way. We did it differently in 1.6 vs > HEAD, where we applied patches to both branches simultaneously by > hand, and we might switch to that mode once HEAD has suffifiently > diverted from the 1.8 branch. Hmm, sorry for bothering you, but would it be possible to not wait that long before merging? :-) Especially since (I presume) patching both branches should not cause any problem for now precisely because they have not diverged. Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel