From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: gcc 2.95 inline scm_is_pair workaround Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 08:49:27 +0200 Organization: LAAS-CNRS Message-ID: <8764jyv9jc.fsf@laas.fr> References: <873bf5inf2.fsf@zip.com.au> <87wtcgnu12.fsf@zagadka.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1148280706 16892 80.91.229.2 (22 May 2006 06:51:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 06:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 22 08:51:43 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fi4GQ-0007KB-Qp for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 08:51:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fi4GP-0002JE-BX for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 02:51:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fi4GN-0002J1-Dj for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 02:51:35 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fi4GL-0002Ie-KB for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 02:51:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fi4GL-0002IZ-GC for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 02:51:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.93.0.15] (helo=laas.laas.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1Fi4KH-00076v-96 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 02:55:37 -0400 Original-Received: by laas.laas.fr (8.13.6/8.13.4) with SMTP id k4M6pSQu023283; Mon, 22 May 2006 08:51:30 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Marius Vollmer X-URL: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 3 Prairial an 214 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEB1F5364 X-PGP-Key: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu Mail-Followup-To: Marius Vollmer , guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87wtcgnu12.fsf@zagadka.de> (Marius Vollmer's message of "Sun, 21 May 2006 02:41:45 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: 0 () X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang at CNRS-LAAS X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5939 Archived-At: Hi, Marius Vollmer writes: > Should we still support GCC 2.95? If it's not too costly (in terms of necessary workarounds), perhaps we should. Some people argue that GCC 2.95 is still very useful notably because it's much faster that newer GCCs (and that will certainly always be true). Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel