ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
> Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net> writes:
>>
>> So on balance I don't think we need to provide complete compatibility
>> within Guile here.
>
> Right, I think you convinced me.  :-)

In absense of violent objections I made the change below.  I didn't do
the same in the 1.6 branch, there I only amended the srfi-9
implementation.

Is the local-eval stuff supposed to minimize the amount of environment
or whatever captured by the returned functions?  Guessing that's so I
put the type check in a helper function.