From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: autocompilation support in master Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:50:03 +0100 Message-ID: <8763f2l9tg.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87hbyujpof.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> <87vdn6gvgf.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> <20090609005226.GA3468@fibril.netris.org> <20090609184723.GA3694@fibril.netris.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1244757133 22378 80.91.229.12 (11 Jun 2009 21:52:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Mark H Weaver , guile-devel To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 11 23:52:10 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MEsAk-0004Jq-KP for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:50:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46367 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MEsAk-00046t-5z for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:50:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MEsAg-00045w-5g for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:50:54 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MEsAb-00044H-Cx for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:50:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35493 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MEsAb-00044C-08 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:50:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]:54746) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MEsAa-0007cI-7r for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:50:48 -0400 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-152-99-133.range86-152.btcentralplus.com [86.152.99.133]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA951F7613; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:50:05 +0100 (BST) Original-Received: from arudy.ossau.uklinux.net (arudy [127.0.0.1]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07EFA38022; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:50:03 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: (Andy Wingo's message of "Tue\, 09 Jun 2009 23\:39\:45 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:8667 Archived-At: Andy Wingo writes: > On Tue 09 Jun 2009 20:47, Mark H Weaver writes: > >> To generate the backtrace, I added the following lines near the top of >> guile-tools. Is there a better way? >> >> (debug-enable 'debug) >> (debug-enable 'backtrace) >> (debug-set! depth 100) >> (write (debug-options-interface)) >> (newline) > > No, this is the best way we have currently. As I understand it, the > debugging evaluator is slower than the normal one -- but at this point, > who cares? With the VM we are already faster and we keep backtraces. We > should have backtraces on, always. > > Does anyone have objections to that? If not, I'll make that change > within the week. Sorry, but I'm not clear what change you're proposing here. Neil