From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: rfc: (ice-9 accumulate) Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:05:40 +0100 Message-ID: <8763799nwr.fsf@ambire.localdomain> References: <873a2fo8wc.fsf@ambire.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263190322 14385 80.91.229.12 (11 Jan 2010 06:12:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 06:12:02 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 11 07:11:54 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NUDVK-0006lP-Ah for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:11:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33086 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NUDVK-0008Lr-HV for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:11:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NUDV8-0008JR-5b for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:11:42 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NUDV5-0008Gq-MJ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:11:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53809 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NUDV5-0008Gb-GX for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:11:39 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp-out113.alice.it ([85.37.17.113]:2979) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NUDV5-0005jA-4D for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:11:39 -0500 Original-Received: from FBCMMO04.fbc.local ([192.168.184.135]) by smtp-out113.alice.it with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:11:36 +0100 Original-Received: from FBCMCL01B06.fbc.local ([192.168.69.87]) by FBCMMO04.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:08:07 +0100 Original-Received: from ambire.localdomain ([79.41.72.175]) by FBCMCL01B06.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:08:06 +0100 Original-Received: from ttn by ambire.localdomain with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NUDPI-0001Td-N2 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:05:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Andy Wingo's message of "Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:55:58 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2010 06:08:06.0877 (UTC) FILETIME=[715D78D0:01CA9284] X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1+ X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9851 Archived-At: () Andy Wingo () Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:55:58 +0100 You are not selling your idea very well here. But I'm still OK with it :) Well, spewing all manner of code is breathing in, dropping thin interfaces is breathing out... So, here's the deal, as far as I understand inlining... (And your question is about inlining, afaics, in the sense that the Waddell paper treats inlining) I'm not sure what my dreaming was about, exactly... [inlining opportunities / plans] So this particular construct is unlikely to be inlined nicely. OK, i'll go mull on that for a bit. Thanks for the overview. There's lots of stuff in ice-9 that noone knows about, but I don't think there's something like this. Hopefully we can document more of it using the new (texinfo reflection) infrastructure. In reply to a similar comment from Ludovic, i offered to submit patches for missing (ice-9 foo) documentation. I hereby revise that offer to submit patches using this infrastructure, once i get around to playing with it. I imagine it can't be much different from Guile 1.4.x's. thi