From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add new debug meta-command ,error Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:45:00 +0200 Message-ID: <8762yr6d9v.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> References: <1283143931-6220-1-git-send-email-jao@gnu.org> <87aao36gag.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283201574 26231 80.91.229.12 (30 Aug 2010 20:52:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:52:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 30 22:52:53 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqBLX-0002aC-Ft for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:52:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55758 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OqBLW-000234-Af for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:52:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59683 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OqBL7-0001lJ-VK for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:52:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqBE0-0001eZ-Nj for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:45:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:45876) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqBE0-0001eS-Jp for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:45:04 -0400 Original-Received: by wyb36 with SMTP id 36so8516851wyb.0 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:45:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:x-attribution:x-url:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=g+dl67TqWs6nUIFADwtdtS/MloBSCcDzc8hi4qJVpUg=; b=g9eXi1T3ED5IDTSc8VepbbAZhP6u3MKjVM+xIPvpF42JLDW8LG76Tyd7zloJJXyFh4 GfpQDs+1o2YjlmpCA3Vqp6iaY07y7Sk7XLCxOj/OjFK4a+uHzOk3JaXEdMIMwvq7LLN+ T+pJR1zcik+ET4Lpz8S2YM9JaUJ1pRHuaq+II= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :x-attribution:x-url:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; b=DKAjVKBFtg1DaO2ANRFfEbL9jlAKtBdxBZRwWTRG/4jI81razsrp6J5h0H/W//u3wU kHvmR5x/SoV5NSvAhFDTMy6C0blvud+S2hk9bZ9S45q0dJyKcsGKbMTpjjYCOeObz3dh 87baGaM4c9Yb8jMjjpbxYL3qLjY3ub7Fk/XbA= Original-Received: by 10.227.138.76 with SMTP id z12mr5592333wbt.60.1283201103499; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:45:03 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from newton.homeunix.net ([83.50.71.238]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a1sm6874405wbb.14.2010.08.30.13.45.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:45:03 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=newton.homeunix.net ident=jao) by newton.homeunix.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OqBDx-0004Rr-1R; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:45:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Andy Wingo's message of "Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:44:23 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Attribution: jao X-URL: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10813 Archived-At: On Mon, Aug 30 2010, Andy Wingo wrote: > On Mon 30 Aug 2010 12:39, "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" writes: > >> changed the name of the command from `error' to `message' > >> I'm not specially happy with the new name, but couldn't think of >> anything better. Suggestions welcome. > > How about "error-message" ? Perhaps abbreviated as ,error ? yeah, that was my first idea, but i thought you'd find it too long :) i'm for it if you like it, though -- perhaps we could abbreviate it as ,e to compensate? jao -- How many Zen Buddhist does it take to change a light bulb? Two. One to change it and one not to change it.