From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Extension search path changed in 1.9 Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:01:02 +0100 Message-ID: <8762sqtvb5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87d3pv3gjr.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297440088 16038 80.91.229.12 (11 Feb 2011 16:01:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:01:28 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 11 17:01:24 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PnvQw-0004yv-Fn for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:01:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42575 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PnvQw-0000p0-0w for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:01:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43336 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PnvQt-0000oj-9X for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:01:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PnvQs-00055W-Al for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:01:19 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:55259) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PnvQs-00055I-3U for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:01:18 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PnvQq-0004qI-UW for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:01:16 +0100 Original-Received: from 193.50.110.208 ([193.50.110.208]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:01:16 +0100 Original-Received: from ludo by 193.50.110.208 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:01:16 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 32 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.50.110.208 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 23 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pluvi=F4se?= an 219 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:XwJueZMRBi4a+XDVD1Rt8iq7Yk8= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11558 Archived-At: Hi Andy, Andy Wingo writes: > On Tue 23 Nov 2010 21:56, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> In 1.8, to run the test suite of libguile-foo from its build tree, I >> typically had a ‘pre-inst-guile’ like this: >> >> exec @abs_top_builddir@/libtool --mode=execute \ >> -dlopen "@abs_top_builddir@/src/libguile-foo.la" \ >> @GUILE@ "$@" >> >> which amounts to “LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$PWD/src/.libs:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH” on >> GNU/Linux. >> >> However, this no longer works with 2.0: if libguile-foo.so is already >> present in SCM_EXTENSIONS_DIR, then it will be loaded instead of the one >> from the build tree. > > This sounds like a bad change. Should we append to the > LTDL_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable instead? Yes, let’s do that. Sounds hackish but it would work. > I guess that's what we need to do with the libtools that are "out > there". The libtool invocations you mean? Thanks, Ludo’.