From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: 2.0.x branched! Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 23:25:25 +0000 Message-ID: <8762shlyca.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87sjvpguvj.fsf@gnu.org> <87aahtm63o.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298072345 1720 80.91.229.12 (18 Feb 2011 23:39:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 23:39:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 19 00:39:00 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PqZud-0003Jz-UJ for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 00:39:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52058 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PqZhe-0004e8-R4 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:25:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57765 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PqZhb-0004dn-Ph for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:25:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PqZhZ-0000Am-Sr for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:25:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]:33219) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PqZhZ-0000A7-OY; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:25:29 -0500 Original-Received: from arudy (unknown [78.145.24.37]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B631F6635; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 23:25:26 +0000 (GMT) Original-Received: from neil-laptop (unknown [192.168.11.4]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9984438013; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 23:25:25 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: (Andy Wingo's message of "Sat, 19 Feb 2011 00:17:54 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-Received-From: 80.84.72.33 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11661 Archived-At: Andy Wingo writes: > On Fri 18 Feb 2011 21:37, Neil Jerram writes: > >> Now that 2.0.0 is out, I presume the general procedure from now on >> should be: >> >> - committing safe 2.0.x stuff (in particular, as far as I'm concerned, >> docs) to the stable-2.0 branch >> >> - committing anything else to master >> >> - periodically merging from stable-2.0 to master. >> >> Is that right? > > That sounds about right to me, though I am quite ignorant in this > regard. Compatible changes on 2.0.x seem fine to me; we should live in > 2.0.x for a year or two I think. > > Tough to plan for the future, though! Cool, thanks! Neil