From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Configure GMP to use GC allocation functions, remove bignum finalizers
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 22:25:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8762i5mf4x.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zkfh9x8r.fsf@pobox.com> (Andy Wingo's message of "Sun, 27 Nov 2011 20:33:08 +0100")
Hi!
Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> skribis:
> I still this this is a good idea. The key would be to GC more often
> when the heap image grows faster than GC'd memory is allocated. We can
> detect this situation by computing (ImageSize_t+1 - ImageSize_t) /
> (LiveBytes_t+1 - LiveBytes_t), where ImageSize is some measure of the
> total process size, perhaps via getrusage(), and LiveBytes is
> GC_get_heap_size() - GC_get_free_bytes().
The problem is that this measurement doesn’t allow us to differentiate
between a growing heap with objects that may be freed as a result of
running the GC, and a growing heap just because the application needs
more malloc’d objects.
(I think this is the argument that was made against my __malloc_hook
patch back then. [0])
A longer term option may be to augment libgc with something akin to our
old scm_gc_register_collectable_memory.
WDYT?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
[0] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.garbage-collection.boehmgc/4371
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-27 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-31 19:48 [PATCH] Configure GMP to use GC allocation functions, remove bignum finalizers Mark H Weaver
2011-05-31 20:07 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-05-31 21:52 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-05-31 23:18 ` Neil Jerram
2011-05-31 23:32 ` Neil Jerram
2011-06-01 8:34 ` Andy Wingo
2011-06-02 23:14 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-11-27 19:33 ` Andy Wingo
2011-11-27 21:25 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2011-11-28 22:23 ` Andy Wingo
2011-11-28 23:10 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-11-28 23:50 ` Andy Wingo
2011-11-29 11:06 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-11-29 11:35 ` Andy Wingo
2011-11-29 13:20 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-11-29 12:45 ` Andy Wingo
2011-11-29 13:18 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-11-29 14:44 ` Andy Wingo
2011-11-29 16:22 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-12-02 11:10 ` Andy Wingo
2011-12-02 17:02 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-12-02 18:12 ` Andy Wingo
2011-12-02 22:17 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-12-03 10:57 ` Andy Wingo
2011-12-03 17:57 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8762i5mf4x.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=neil@ossau.uklinux.net \
--cc=wingo@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).