From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: And another deprecation joke Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:01:32 +0100 Message-ID: <8762hsmnn7.fsf@pobox.com> References: <877h28iln6.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1323270121 8897 80.91.229.12 (7 Dec 2011 15:02:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 15:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 07 16:01:56 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RYJ0O-0005o2-OG for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:01:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39864 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RYJ0O-0000yM-0T for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:01:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60473) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RYJ0H-0000y3-Qc for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:01:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RYJ08-0006nq-In for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:01:49 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:52863 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RYJ05-0006n7-Um; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:01:38 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BC88FED; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:01:37 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=NWCEjXIZPa0K3WoSgrhCmnGOhRw=; b=vtL5R9 65WBB5UaD4yxF6F1YCqPpm77R/yMpiwf0JuFULdLDXEfqoZ+Xa4Kcg0ARIrNAZzA LyazM5qiJxU2JzBPYcNR75XSBBP8yZ9yl8Ypk76HcuULVIOnnRbukRYimv2g6CH6 8dHxwSAPJyaHDjs1TO6kZM100/aP+6jaRD6jk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Wo3SIAznpwDeWKK48oXRbnkmOiLp18bC 2s+OFRAdn3qgJbA1uTYt7rkWGBJEIxedmtsNHiJzNdJWjIH+rD67e9Fo2S6/qWT7 WY7DZq9IQpYUXF4RsOEVoa1tOMALAO3T31B1/qS1+LPRyYzSkWAM7MUSRU4YxGeT tlih09NY+Rk= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C9D8FEB; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:01:36 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E8548FE8; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:01:36 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <877h28iln6.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Wed, 07 Dec 2011 13:58:21 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 5BEC566A-20E4-11E1-A18A-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:13006 Archived-At: On Wed 07 Dec 2011 13:58, David Kastrup writes: > `dimensions->uniform-array' is deprecated. Use `make-typed-array' instead. > > Unfortunately, this was not even called in the application. > > The actual function called was make-uniform-vector. Ah, interesting. You might not be a native english speaker; I don't know. However, the proper word is "bug", not "lie" or "disrespect". Thanks for finding them and pointing them out! In the future though, please be nice, on this list. Thanks, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/