From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 15:02:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87625cz190.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pq3l30ff.fsf@gnu.org> <871ug0ddfi.fsf@googlemail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1352642559 25625 80.91.229.3 (11 Nov 2012 14:02:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 14:02:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Mark H. Weaver" , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Ian Price Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 11 15:02:50 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TXY7c-0008VU-Ph for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 15:02:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34402 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXY7T-0002DX-2g for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:02:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXY7O-0002Cz-1Y for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:02:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXY7K-0006je-U5 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:02:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a01:e0b:1:123:ca0a:a9ff:fe03:271e] (port=57324 helo=xanadu.aquilenet.fr) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXY7K-0006iK-OE for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:02:30 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xanadu.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7EB3A8F4; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 15:02:19 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from xanadu.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xanadu.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ABwKtncLF4dW; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 15:02:19 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from pluto (reverse-83.fdn.fr [80.67.176.83]) by xanadu.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 384BAA5CE; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 15:02:19 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 21 Brumaire an 221 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <871ug0ddfi.fsf@googlemail.com> (Ian Price's message of "Sun, 11 Nov 2012 03:30:09 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130005 (Ma Gnus v0.5) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2a01:e0b:1:123:ca0a:a9ff:fe03:271e X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:15153 Archived-At: Hi, Ian Price skribis: > The patch looks fine to me (it had better be, since it is already pushed > :P), We could always change that. > however I wonder if it wouldn't be prudent to look to moving > define-record-type into guile proper, and making (use-modules (srfi > srfi-9)) effectively a no-op. In general, I=E2=80=99m not in favor of adding global bindings. Quite the opposite: I=E2=80=99d be happier if, for instance, POSIX stuff was under an (ice-9 posix) module. That=E2=80=99d make sandboxing much easier. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.