From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: goops - guile-clutter unexpected bug while using #:virtual slot allocation for a subclass Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 22:35:45 +0100 Message-ID: <8761btfcni.fsf@pobox.com> References: <20141219174633.6efb845e@capac> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1422308225 23025 80.91.229.3 (26 Jan 2015 21:37:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:37:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: David Pirotte Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 26 22:37:03 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YFrLD-0006AP-EI for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 22:37:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44159 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFrLC-0006Km-V7 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:37:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44633) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFrL8-0006KW-LH for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:36:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFrL5-0000hE-EC for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:36:58 -0500 Original-Received: from pb-sasl1.int.icgroup.com ([208.72.237.25]:58706 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFrL5-0000h8-8G for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:36:55 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B38B324D5; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:36:53 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=5wRL698PHJzCMaz6HylFfrE31X4=; b=D0xh96 O5mDQWkr+/sd/SjnDWm7UQkYfMKSUAZJsU0U8j6o5cJ+2i1xEuyqYeJVgdlQLSA1 rSgBnvTL9cS9SWuGLi7JSA5D1vXTBLupjkD5WckUeDHnIes6x+VMV4pLwg2yyQ5y cJnSjPKBLRTlmUB8vjq5FmSvBvPloDEcjGW9g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=twoYOTml2BdxjFcVT4JNVKOErsKR6Jts fpO/y2M71c9Bg0J11QsNpBgj0qtAIF31ht+te9vXQEVpCN5ef8vILVt95DLXCSlI UnLZr1esVZmqr0lQ5rYhpJFFqaajuR9WMJPiq8acSt0rq29VNUndHhpEZnTQ4/wX Oj1rl5PNOP4= Original-Received: from pb-sasl1.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730AC324D4; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:36:53 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18A0B32494; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:35:48 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20141219174633.6efb845e@capac> (David Pirotte's message of "Fri, 19 Dec 2014 17:46:33 -0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4B7C34D4-A5A3-11E4-B427-B05EFC961345-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.72.237.25 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:17637 Archived-At: On Fri 19 Dec 2014 20:46, David Pirotte writes: > It would be really nice if someone can help me with the following unexpected bug: > > http://paste.lisp.org/+33RA > > I don't think i'll be able to solve it by myself, at this level of knowledge I have > from both goops [implementation I mean, knowledge close to zero] and the low level > machinery gnome/gobject/gtype.scm What is the bug? The top part that you list that does not use guile-gnome works fine, and I don't want to bring guile-gnome into consideration when looking for GOOPS bugs :) Can you still reproduce the bug on stable-2.0 or master? Can you make a test case without guile-gnome? If so please include it in your mail instead of using a pastebin. Thanks :) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/