Re: [PATCH 1/1] Support mkdtemp via mkdtemp! and scm_mkdtemp

[Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>]

Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org> writes:

> Mike Gran <spk121@yahoo.com> writes:
>
>> Since mkdtemp already returns a string of the new directory name,
>> it might be more scheme-like to not modify the input string, and instead
>> just return the new directory name.
>
> Perhaps, though I was just matching the existing semantics of guile
> mkstemp, i.e. figured maybe they should behave the same.

...mkstemp! I meant, and I think I might still somewhat favor keeping
the correspondence between a mkstemp! and mkdtemp! that have the same
semantics, and more or less directly match their POSIX functions.

Though if we thought it was worth it, I suppose we could also provide
trivial mkstemp and mkdtemp wrappers (without the exclamation points),
that do the extra copy for you.

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4