From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jakub-w@riseup.net Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] srfi-64: fix double evaluation of test-name Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 21:57:56 +0200 Message-ID: <875yz1mhx7.fsf@riseup.net> References: <20210402072033.65809-1-aconchillo@gmail.com> <20210402072033.65809-2-aconchillo@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25213"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:rNvZlDlU+vgpVEUSzA6amdMptxE= Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 29 22:55:20 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ln5zM-0006LL-CR for guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 22:55:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50362 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ln5zK-0005Nj-Ja for guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 16:55:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55200) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ln5z9-0005NX-RP for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 16:55:07 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:54492) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ln5z8-0004BP-C7 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 16:55:07 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ln5z4-00061m-Ig for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 22:55:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.devel:20779 Archived-At: For srfi-64 you should really post your patches to srfi's mailing list since Guile uses the reference implementation. There was some discussion about switching to another one but it didn't happen. (Yet?) Some relevant links to upstream: https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-64/ https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-64/