From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Handling BUGS. Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 15:13:11 -0600 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <874rj54ql4.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <87g02t4zgn.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87lmcko60l.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87elic8k8e.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87r8mcgx4m.fsf@gaff.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87n0x01bci.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87u1r77a7c.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87wuw2gk81.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87n0wxzol5.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1017004530 8924 127.0.0.1 (24 Mar 2002 21:15:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 21:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ttn@glug.org, evan@glug.org, guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16pFKr-0002Jp-00 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 22:15:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16pFKY-0000B9-00; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 16:15:10 -0500 Original-Received: from dsl-209-87-109-2.constant.com ([209.87.109.2] helo=defaultvalue.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16pFIi-000083-00 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 16:13:16 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A10356A; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 15:13:11 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 45603AA3; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 15:13:11 -0600 (CST) Original-To: Marius Vollmer In-Reply-To: <87n0wxzol5.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> (Marius Vollmer's message of "24 Mar 2002 21:40:38 +0100") Original-Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:183 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:183 Marius Vollmer writes: > I don't think bugs need numbers, just no-bugs-database should be > enough. On second thought, I completely agree that just having one set of files is a better idea, though if the bugs database keeps growing, we might need to archive older stuff at some point -- that's all I was really thinking of. However there are probably much better ways to handle that. However I *am* a little hesitant about the free-form bug/file-names, but since I'm having trouble figuring out exactly why that worries me, we'll just ignore me for now :> -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel