From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: How do I determine the argument type... Date: 01 Jun 2003 20:45:13 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <874r39prgm.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <3EBC71BF.B2264C7@veritas.com> <874r3t5o1f.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <3EC6A6CA.94855664@veritas.com> <87of213tk0.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87ptmfx0i3.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1054493181 24534 80.91.224.249 (1 Jun 2003 18:46:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 18:46:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 01 20:46:19 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19MXqU-0006NP-00 for ; Sun, 01 Jun 2003 20:46:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19MXrt-0007MJ-HD for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2003 14:47:45 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19MXrF-0005vV-0z for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2003 14:47:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19MXr0-0005Lp-Ui for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2003 14:46:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.dokom.net ([195.253.8.218]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19MXqO-00058e-PR for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2003 14:46:12 -0400 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway43.dip132.dokom.de ([195.138.43.132] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by mail.dokom.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #3) id 19MXsG-0004Eb-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2003 20:48:08 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 12682 invoked by uid 1000); 1 Jun 2003 18:45:13 -0000 Original-To: Kevin Ryde In-Reply-To: <87ptmfx0i3.fsf@zip.com.au> Original-Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2463 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2463 Kevin Ryde writes: > Marius Vollmer writes: > > > > Ahh, I see. Yes, it was not a good thing to change gh_new2str that > > way. I'm not sure what to do about this. Changing this back is just > > as bad as the original change from int to size_t. > > The manual still says "int". Damn. > Maybe call it a bug fix and put it back to that. Hmm, no, I prefer changing the docs. "size_t" is the right type, and not many people seem to be affected by the int -> size_t change, so we chould leave it at size_t. -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel