unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.de>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: New syntax: (: MODULE-NAME VARIABLE-NAME)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:36:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874qx4oxst.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3r808w44f.fsf@laruns.ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "16 Nov 2003 18:38:24 +0000")

Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net> writes:

> I just noticed, though, that there are some other symbols (than :)
> available that don't have other meanings and which could be understood
> as relevant to a module lookup:

Yes, for some reason, I was fixated on ':' and didn't seriously think
about alternatives.

>   (@ MOD-NAME VAR-NAME)
> Seems quite good, with @ meaning `at' as in `in the specified module'.

Yes, I like this one best, too.  We could use '@' for exported
bindings and '@@' for internal ones.

>   (. MOD-NAME VAR-NAME)
> Intuitively very similar to : IMO, but without the keyword issues.
> However, (i) some people might want `.' for the mathematical dot
> (scalar) product; (ii) Guile currently seems confused about whether
> `.' is a symbol:

The dot '.' is a syntactic element when writing and reading improper
lists:

   guile> (cons 'a 'b)
   (a . b)

It can't really be used as a symbol.

> Of these, I like @ the most.

Yep.

-- 
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3  331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405


_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel


  reply	other threads:[~2003-11-16 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-13 18:12 New syntax: (: MODULE-NAME VARIABLE-NAME) Marius Vollmer
2003-11-13 19:47 ` Neil Jerram
2003-11-13 20:58   ` Marius Vollmer
2003-11-14 21:04     ` Neil Jerram
2003-11-15 15:19       ` Marius Vollmer
2003-11-15 19:22         ` Neil Jerram
2003-11-16 17:31           ` Marius Vollmer
2003-11-16 18:20             ` Neil Jerram
2003-11-16 18:38               ` Neil Jerram
2003-11-16 20:36                 ` Marius Vollmer [this message]
2003-11-17 20:18                   ` Neil Jerram
2003-11-17 21:34                     ` Marius Vollmer
2003-11-16 20:28               ` Marius Vollmer
2003-11-14 22:09 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2003-11-15 15:10   ` Marius Vollmer
2003-11-17  2:00     ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2003-11-17 14:41       ` Marius Vollmer
2003-11-16  8:02 ` Dirk Herrmann
2003-11-17 14:44 ` New syntax (@ MODULE-NAME VARIABLE-NAME) committed Marius Vollmer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874qx4oxst.fsf@zagadka.ping.de \
    --to=mvo@zagadka.de \
    --cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).