From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ? Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 06:15:38 +1000 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <874qx1igb9.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <8765hnf308.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <1068823738.13123.54.camel@localhost> <20031114155148.GI16650@powergnu.laas.fr> <1069058032.1638.21.camel@localhost> <874qx3rogk.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87u153q8yk.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87n0avq7pf.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1069186666 7301 80.91.224.253 (18 Nov 2003 20:17:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 20:17:46 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 18 21:17:43 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AMCIA-00020q-00 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 21:17:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AMDFW-0003GO-Ih for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AMDFA-00034m-RI for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:18:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AMDEe-0002RN-DJ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:18:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [61.8.0.36] (helo=snoopy.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AMDDs-0001d4-Bh for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:17:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mongrel.pacific.net.au (mongrel.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.107]) by snoopy.pacific.net.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id hAIKFqV0001048 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 07:15:52 +1100 Original-Received: from localhost (ppp36.dyn228.pacific.net.au [203.143.228.36]) by mongrel.pacific.net.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id hAIKEJDJ018297 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 07:14:20 +1100 Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AMCGC-0000ii-00; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 06:15:40 +1000 Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: <87n0avq7pf.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> (Marius Vollmer's message of "Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:29:48 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3053 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3053 Marius Vollmer writes: > > and for h = a + h*37 we get You probably want to write *37 like that, gcc is usually good at reducing constant multipliers when it can help a given chip. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel