From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel,gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Upcoming 1.6.5 release Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:58:08 -0500 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <874qmz41kv.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> References: <4119CB4B.1030204@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1092927595 16139 80.91.224.253 (19 Aug 2004 14:59:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:59:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Users , guile-devel Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 19 16:59:20 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BxoNr-00021J-00 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:59:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BxoS7-0001bD-QO for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:03:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BxoS5-0001aR-T4 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:03:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BxoS4-0001Z3-5o for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:03:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BxoS3-0001Ye-7t; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:03:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [66.93.216.237] (helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BxoNB-00057s-6r; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:58:37 -0400 Original-Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (omen.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.1]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F2D4110; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:58:33 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BF5BF410AC; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:58:08 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: neil@ossau.uklinux.net In-Reply-To: <4119CB4B.1030204@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Wed, 11 Aug 2004 08:31:23 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3982 gmane.lisp.guile.user:3398 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3982 Neil Jerram writes: > On the second point, can anyone comment whether there is any practical > difference between a Guile DLL built with MSVC and one built with > MINGW? The two points that seem useful to me from MSVC-building are > (i) direct use of the MS C runtime; (ii) MSVC debugging information. > But it may be that MINGW could give me these as well. I'd say fixes for the above would be fine once you can figure out what the "right thing" is. i.e. whether mingw would be equivalent or not, etc. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel