From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: scm_raise using raise() Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:03:16 +1100 Message-ID: <874przny2j.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1166054610 13178 80.91.229.10 (14 Dec 2006 00:03:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 14 01:03:28 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Gue4K-0005Tr-Pz for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:03:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gue4K-0008VI-FT for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:03:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gue4H-0008Qm-8O for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:03:21 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gue4F-0008Oj-1r for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:03:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gue4E-0008Og-Um for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:03:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [61.8.2.231] (helo=mailout2.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gue4E-0003yo-BC for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:03:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (mailproxy1.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.162]) by mailout2.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3CE1113B0 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:03:16 +1100 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (ppp245A.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.36.90]) by mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5E1A8C4D for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:03:16 +1100 (EST) Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gue4C-0007Gy-M1 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:03:16 +1100 Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6333 Archived-At: Is there a reason scm_raise is implemented using kill() instead of raise()? I suppose raise() is a C89-ism, but nowadays it can be used unconditionally can't it? (And in fact for instance mingw has raise but not kill.) _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel