From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, master, updated. 442f3f20ddd33b43743ea181d95024c10622df52 Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 23:04:44 +0200 Message-ID: <874ov7a843.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871vqbkcx1.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1243371904 13934 80.91.229.12 (26 May 2009 21:05:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 21:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 26 23:05:01 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M93pU-0000tu-3G for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 23:05:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38074 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M93pT-0002la-Kt for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 17:04:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M93pQ-0002h5-8O for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 17:04:56 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M93pL-0002Vq-Rh for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 17:04:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52533 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M93pL-0002VN-Iu for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 17:04:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:47533) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M93pK-0004QV-I0 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 17:04:51 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.41,254,1241388000"; d="scan'208";a="28362246" Original-Received: from vpn74.saclay.inria.fr (HELO nixey) ([195.83.213.74]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 26 May 2009 23:04:48 +0200 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 7 Prairial an 217 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: i686-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: (Andy Wingo's message of "Tue, 26 May 2009 22:31:17 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:8526 Archived-At: Andy Wingo writes: > But I guess that we want to support -Wundef or something, and this is in > a public header, so I suppose you are right :) Exactly. >> Also, I'd have preferred `_GUILE_WITHIN_GUILE', which is clearly in >> Guile's name space, and is similar to GMP's `__GMP_WITHIN_GMP' ("rule of >> least surprise"). What do you think? > > I don't care :) I thought I recalled that Neil wanted something else, > and Bruno had this in the gnulib docs, so I just used that. Please tell > me to change it if you want it changed :-) Let's see what others think. :-) Ludo'.