From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: rackets syntax parse Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:36:17 +0100 Message-ID: <874nviae6m.fsf@pobox.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327580104 6254 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2012 12:15:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:15:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Stefan Israelsson Tampe Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 26 13:14:59 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RqOED-0002RJ-QU for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:14:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36337 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqOED-0007dL-0I for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:14:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57058) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqOE7-0007cq-LE for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:14:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqOE4-0006F1-RJ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:14:51 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:46747 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqOE4-0006Er-Og for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:14:48 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56AC47C27; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:14:47 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=qNy2yFTwVNiv/II1olZHVShp9qQ=; b=Q9tGGC KwX4Lo5+E/r7S29cIYGGgxyns4KY4tV6Jz+MWEliPSltJ7Ag7hAKbFAKKxsKI6ez +McqsvHrjBAt4mR+oWgwYwUD94eXx89gP28CfDmXl4PZC0spERM6PcfFeS15c+8j EMm6/q7tCoA0xvIIuI60dCU5IOhplH4fMMrlA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=R3vPZhqj/B5sYB2/ekz2SN5+HdJM+PGI 4I/O/DxbCcFK4drvfJdXZM24zCZwQgSLHuLSX5RqG7iuzfRlzw1uCsPUIcCs2lbV qcc/iSlNhtdAbj8otqtGLCIAjFKl117ayA05Y4QgCaNPIbp4++Np8drt99g2i9aP N/WtvNBLrKc= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADAD7C26; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:14:47 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1A3B7C25; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:14:46 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Israelsson Tampe's message of "Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:37:17 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 565B3400-4817-11E1-98C5-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:13687 Archived-At: On Wed 25 Jan 2012 21:37, Stefan Israelsson Tampe writes: > I got it working with an old version of guile but have problem with newest > stable-2.0 What version did you get it working with? In a year there have only been 25 commits to psyntax, and none of them should have changed anything fundamental. > Again the main issue is that guile psyntax does not support the #s notation in racket and hence the > hacks on the syntax objects. (see the series of emails that I send previous week) I'll look again. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/