From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: GNU Guile 2.0.4 released Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:41:24 +0100 Message-ID: <874nvcw6nv.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87mx946ha2.fsf@gnu.org> <87ty3c51x1.fsf@gnu.org> <877h083kha.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328002911 18473 80.91.229.3 (31 Jan 2012 09:41:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:41:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 31 10:41:51 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RsADi-0003xu-9P for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:41:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44802 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsADh-0004sW-GH for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:41:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37339) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsADa-0004pD-83 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:41:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsADR-00043q-IN for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:41:38 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:61796 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsADR-00043i-3E; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:41:29 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD27F5CE9; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:41:28 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=nOI41r2/1U5l TzzEnc5+KYFM0g0=; b=CnNBO+L6n6DyGerqyHDmrRVZOtYvAu9p/EYBy6vuE6sy qIvFtL6Uqv4rdk4qU28qKqW00vQDyN8lms3Z7BnB8u2+Qq61DHrTIN76ysDzz+t6 DOY9TMuUSMo+du56k0cE/3N6sQ0Wv+/B5zvx7ZZ56ufr9svtUjBWo3weiU7RLts= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=P/dgT4 xe4mAItwqDEc78fsYmM4qnZ9PaleGbYsDarH5nedoBKWCA4PC7gb8sjgV5H0Ptzv ElTjLG+hnmRNg5D2GOxPA4SJ1hMtWEhokwKpY1E1HXoO1BxIJhR1bgWn9JqnFNIu omYHbZ46RqU1Uf4qf55Kirl8JS2ju+eR7Qflo= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60565CE8; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:41:28 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [85.50.103.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 305DA5CE7; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:41:28 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <877h083kha.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:15:45 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: BFB48E98-4BEF-11E1-8AF1-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:13758 Archived-At: On Mon 30 Jan 2012 23:15, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > All apologies. This should be fixed now with 2.0.5. Thanks for handling the release, Ludo. What a crazy process, this time. Do you have any thoughts about how it might be made smoother in the future? > And note that this significantly increases our average release rate, > which is excellent for publicity, no? :) --=20 http://wingolog.org/