From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Problems with compilation on Trisquel 5.5 Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 14:27:38 +0200 Message-ID: <874nrxo3et.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87mx5z5yrx.fsf@gnu.org> <878vhisstw.fsf@pobox.com> <87bom6z3md.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1336048086 27295 80.91.229.3 (3 May 2012 12:28:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 12:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 03 14:28:05 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SPv8e-0004Kc-F1 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 May 2012 14:28:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59480 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SPv8d-0002Ns-RF for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 May 2012 08:28:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51784) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SPv8S-0002NQ-In for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2012 08:28:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SPv8M-0008Eg-5q for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2012 08:27:52 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:38893 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SPv8L-0008Dv-U3; Thu, 03 May 2012 08:27:46 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 313DC97FF; Thu, 3 May 2012 08:27:42 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=o6hbtlCmlrCl 2NV9lkASHxs1JB8=; b=noHTJjPh2Y3DTHiWngDlwRXzpcOxAA1i8Sk5Fa8UVTNG deNhmk3f6IuxlyFnFroh7r/ygcMljbQqqcXI1YDAhq2GWXoP6uaPANKut1mwpV2E 5+b4OZd17MGacuKdDqnzfm3GAD6cUxAk7NVcXLjLrJRLgkGibbAI5R834cy2EGw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=xa3D8V 9q2un3oo+9cqwjKnoLep+la4cCk/fIWG+3y/4K4EutHRWZ/AO9KJjUgZFIyO2Lfi +VAB4VEIxhVE5O62v10Dty4iOa17XQ8ZbEL/1BLvnWagN3Qdt6PFhp1DvF37D1GS f6ACaceCdhCRFVsgzNG4OgfekmjsHoI0Z7Yvo= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2797C97FE; Thu, 3 May 2012 08:27:42 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A35397FC; Thu, 3 May 2012 08:27:41 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87bom6z3md.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Wed, 02 May 2012 23:15:22 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 60AF2384-951B-11E1-B6A2-8BEB728A0A4D-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:14338 Archived-At: On Wed 02 May 2012 23:15, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Andy Wingo skribis: > >> Some versions of libgc do produce one SIGSEGV at startup, when >> determining certain aspects of the process's memory layout. Just FYI :) > > Woow. :-) Do you know which versions/arches are affected? I don't recall. It's an expected SIGSEGV, not an erroneous one. I get it: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00007ffff732f4f6 in GC_find_limit_with_bound (p=3D0x401f4c "", up=3D0, = bound=3D0x0) at os_dep.c:957 warning: Source file is more recent than executable. 957 GC_noop1((word)(*result)); (gdb) bt #0 0x00007ffff732f4f6 in GC_find_limit_with_bound (p=3D0x401f4c "", up= =3D0, bound=3D0x0) at os_dep.c:957 #1 0x00007ffff732f5f9 in GC_init_linux_data_start () at os_dep.c:472 #2 0x00007ffff732df53 in GC_init () at misc.c:899 #3 GC_init () at misc.c:643 #4 0x00007ffff7ee59ed in scm_storage_prehistory () at gc.c:639 Regards, Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/