From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Handling BUGS. Date: 24 Mar 2002 20:14:28 +0100 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <873cyprd63.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <87g02t4zgn.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87lmcko60l.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87elic8k8e.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87r8mcgx4m.fsf@gaff.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87n0x01bci.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87u1r77a7c.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87y9gjz82x.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016997425 3735 127.0.0.1 (24 Mar 2002 19:17:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 19:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ttn@glug.org, evan@glug.org, guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16pDUG-0000y8-00 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 20:17:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16pDSR-0000Uh-00; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 14:15:11 -0500 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip234.dokom.de ([195.138.42.234] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16pDPP-0000Kl-00 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 14:12:03 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 1290 invoked by uid 1000); 24 Mar 2002 19:14:28 -0000 Original-To: Rob Browning In-Reply-To: <87y9gjz82x.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> Original-Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:178 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:178 Rob Browning writes: > Marius Vollmer writes: > > > I have a slightly uneasy feeling about splitting BUGS into multiple > > files. CVS is not very good at moving or renaming files and we > > wouldn't have a centralized log any more. I don't see any problems > > with just keeping all bugs in one file. > > That's fine with me too, I now think having one file per bug is OK as well and I think we should go that route. > though I might still want to have an active > and a resolved file -- keep things a little more wieldy. 'Active' and 'resolved' is only one of many possible categorizations. It might be the most important one, now, but categorizing bugs according to severity, affected release, or assigned developer might be useful as well. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel