From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: primitive-load returning result of last evaluation? Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:09:11 -0500 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <873cxngwko.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019517180 32113 127.0.0.1 (22 Apr 2002 23:13:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 23:13:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ttn@glug.org, a.rottmann@gmx.at, guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16zmzT-0008Lq-00 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 01:13:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16zmyu-0000hj-00; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 19:12:24 -0400 Original-Received: from dsl-209-87-109-2.constant.com ([209.87.109.2] helo=defaultvalue.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16zmvo-0000YS-00 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 19:09:12 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34DE3A29; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:09:11 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0CB3C206E; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:09:11 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: Dirk Herrmann In-Reply-To: (Dirk Herrmann's message of "Mon, 22 Apr 2002 23:48:13 +0200 (MEST)") Original-Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:465 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:465 Dirk Herrmann writes: > IMO, the best solution would be a minimum RnRS guile, including only > functionality for loading modules. Even optional RnRS features > should be loaded on demand. This way, so I hope, we could make > guile's default size very small, much smaller than today. FWIW I agree. I think I'd probably rather see separately named functions for things like "load returning value" than a redefinition of the functions when you load a module. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel